Truck Accident Lawyer Blog

On November 21, 2006, Daniel Becker and his mother, Pamela, were on their way from Mooresville, North Carolina to join family in Alabama for Thanksgiving. Around 10:30 p.m., as they passed through Oconee County, South Carolina, the driver of a northbound rig pulling two trailers lost control of his vehicle. The tractor and double trailers ran through the cable barrier and slammed into the Becker’s southbound vehicle, along with two other vehicles. Daniel, the seatbelted driver, died at the scene. His mother suffered a closed head injury, facial fractures, and multiple upper body fractures. She was airlifted to Greenville Memorial Hospital, but doctors there were ultimately unable to save her life.

The trucker claimed he started coughing and blacked out just before losing control. A subsequent investigation determined that in addition to driving in the rain at night, the driver had the vehicle on cruise control, had his CB radio on, and received two cell phone calls, including one by call waiting, shortly before the collision. Due to the differing accounts of the coughing episode the driver gave to medical personnel and law enforcement, Mr. Becker brought a lawsuit, alleging that distractions were the true cause of the collision. Mr. Becker also sued the trucking company, alleging negligent hiring, negligent supervision, and negligent entrustment of a dangerous instrument (the truck). There was evidence that the driver was suffering serious personal or medical problems that the company knew about and that allowing the driver to continue to control a tractor-trailer created an unreasonable risk of harm to the public. Mr. Becker pointed to recurring logbook violations, which the company is required to review, and to a preventable collision the driver was in just 11 days before the wreck that killed the Beckers.

Both parties hired numerous experts to review the facts and claims in the lawsuit, including experts on “cough syncope,” the driver’s alleged condition. The driver and trucking company settled the suit before trial for $7 million, with the added condition that the company hire an independent safety consultant to help the company implement safety policies covering existing drivers.

Continue reading "$7 Million Settlement for Victims of I-85 Truck Wreck" »

On the July 4th weekend in 2002, Christina Chakonas and Diana Kakidas had plans. They were going to watch the fireworks, then head to a dance club. No drugs, no alcohol, just have some fun. Their group met a group of boys and one of the boys, Adam McDonald, got into Christina’s car for the drive to the club. They were following the other group’s car, but as they pulled onto rural U.S. 30, Christina’s Grand Am was struck by a tractor-trailer. All three died.

Initially, it seemed the collision was entirely Christina’s fault. The truck didn’t have a stop sign, only Christina did. She may not have come to a full stop before pulling out and she may not have had her lights on. But further investigation told another part of the story. The truck driver had driven more hours than safety regulations allow. The “black box” on the truck showed he was speeding. A reconstruction of the collision indicated the driver didn’t hit his brakes until 3 seconds after he slammed into the Grand Am. Together, this painted a picture of a truck driver who was profoundly tired - and not paying attention.

The teens’ families brought suit against the shipper, the driver, and the driver’s trucking company. Lawyers for the teens presented evidence of the collision. They presented evidence that the trucking company should have known the driver wasn’t safe because he had a history of falsifying his driving logs, something the company should have been aware of. The defendants presented evidence of Christina’s fault and argued the black box showed the driver was driving below the speed limit.

On November 2, 2007, a Cook County, Illinois jury decided that the truck driver was 60% responsible for the collision. The jury awarded $8 million to Diana’s and Adam’s families for their losses. The jury valued the loss to Christina’s family at $7 million, but the amount was reduced to $4.2 million because she was 40% responsible.

Continue reading "$20.2 Million Verdict Against Trucking Company After Deaths of 3 Teens" »

The tragic story of how Duane and Janet Willis lost six of their children illustrates why it is so important to seek justice after a truck accident.

The Reverand and Mrs. Willis were traveling through Milwaukee on I-94 in November, 1994 on their way to their adult son’s home for a birthday party. In their Plymouth Grand Voyager minivan were the six youngest of their nine children, ranging from six months to thirteen years old. The Willis’s minivan struck a piece of the taillight/mudflap that fell off a tractor trailer driven by Ricardo Guzman. This piece of debris was a two and a half foot long section of steel bracket. The truck piece punctured the Willis’s gas tank and the sparks that resulted from it dragging on the ground ignited the minivan's gas in the tank. Only one child, thirteen year old Ben, made it out of the van. Reverand and Mrs. Willis were severely burned trying to rescue the other children, but the others perished in the flames. Although his hair was singed off and his lips burned, Ben asked about his siblings before he was flown to the burn unit. He died the next day after asking the nurse to hold his hand and pray with him. Unfortunately, she couldn’t because of the severity of his burns.

The Willises wanted to know how this could have happened. Their lawyer took over 120 depositions of fact witnesses and experts over the next two years. The Willis’s attorney retained experts in fields such as metallurgy, fracture mechanics, and accident investigation. The Willises alleged that the company that leased the trailer failed to properly maintain it and that the truck company improperly hired the driver. The Willises also brought negligence claims against the mudflap manufacturer and design defect claims against Chrysler for its tank design.
One of the most shocking findings of the investigation was that the driver, Ricardo Guzman, couldn’t understand radioed warnings that the mudflap was about to fall off, because he didn’t speak English. When the lawyer dug deeper, he discovered that the driver was able to get a commercial drivers license only because he paid a bribe in the form of a campaign contribution for then Illinois Secretary of State George Ryan. When state investigators tried to investigate the connection of Guzman to Ryan, Ryan ordered his office to stop the investigation. Ryan soon went on to become Governor of Illinois, but the investigation continued. Ryan’s obstruction blossomed into a larger federal investigation that lead to the 2006 corruption trial of former governor. The Willises wrote letters to the court when Ryan was sentenced. The bottom line is that Governor Ryan might not have ever been exposed for his corruption, had the Willis family chosen to do nothing about the tragedy.

The Willis family settled with six civil defendants before trial for $100,000,000. The Willises reportedly have used the settlement largely to support missionary work.

Thanks to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the Chicago Sun-Times and the Transportation Lawyers Association for reporting.

Continue reading "A Trucking Case that Helped Bring Down a Governor" »

This unfortunate case involves a 28 year-old man who was rear-ended by a tractor trailer. The force of the collision threw his vehicle into the path of an oncoming cement truck, which slammed into the victim’s vehicle. The young man died from his injuries at the scene.

After the collision, the driver of the rear-ending truck tested positive for high levels of cocaine and marijuana. The man’s family brought suit in Illinois, because the truck company was negligent for allowing the driver behind the wheel when he was clearly unfit to drive.

This case shows the appalling lengths some truck companies will go to avoid compensating victims. After the victim’s family filed suit in Illinois, the truck company stated under oath that it had only $1 million in insurance available, an obvious attempt to force a low settlement. The family’s attorney, suspecting this wasn’t true, had to file another lawsuit in Oklahoma, where the tractor-trailer was registered. In Oklahoma, defendants like the trucking company can be forced to confirm how much insurance coverage they have. It turned out that the trucking company had far more insurance coverage than they had admitted. There was actually $50,000,000 of insurance available.

At trial, the trucking company fought to keep the jury from hearing evidence of its driver’s drug use, but the judge allowed the evidence to be heard. At the end of the trial, the jury found the rear-ending driver and trucking company were 100% responsible for the collision. The jury awarded the victim’s family $18.2 million for the deceased man's lost future earnings and the loss of the his companionship. The jury awarded an additional $1 million for the man’s suffering before he died at the scene of the wreck.

Hopefully, this will convince the at-fault trucking company to think twice next time before they put a dangerous trucker out on our roads.

Continue reading "Truck Accident Wrongful Death Case Results in $19.2 Million Damages Verdict" »

A young Army officer traveling to his first duty station in Texas struck a tractor trailer that had stopped in the left lane of Interstate 30 near Texarkana in March, 2002. The twenty-three year old lieutenant died from his injuries. The drivers of the truck, a husband-wife team from the Waco, Texas area, had attempted to repair the brakes on their vehicle two hours before the collision by using electrical tape and a toothpick to stop a leak in a high-pressure hydraulic line. When the drivers notified the trucking company of this childish repair, instead of sending a tow truck, the company sent an email congratulating them on their resourcefulness. Of course, the “repair” quickly failed, leaving the tractor-trailer stranded in the left, high speed, lane.
The trucking company and drivers defended in court by blaming the young lieutenant. The defendants said he was at least 60% at fault (if he was more than 50% at fault, he could not recover anything). Further, the trucking company said this was an unusual situation that didn’t reflect its normally safety-oriented practices.

The jury did find that the lieutenant was negligent, but found that his negligence was only 10% of the cause of his injuries. The jury found the driver and the company equally responsible for the remaining 90%. The jury awarded his parents $1,000,000 each for intangible losses, including mental anguish and lost companionship. The jury awarded the soldier’s estate $7,000 in actual damages for burial costs and punitive damages of $15,000,000 against the company and $500,000 against the driver.

Before the verdict, the two sides had entered into a so-called "high-low agreement" to resolve the case. This agreement guaranteed that the soldier’s family would recover between $750,000 and $1,250,000. If the jury had come back with a verdict below $750,000, the family would still recover the minimum $750,000. If the jury awarded more than $1,250,000, the family could not recover the excess. A jury award in between would be recovered at the amount the jury set. The family therefore actually recovered $1.25 million, because of their contractual agreement with the defendants.

With a high-low agreement, victims are guaranteed a recovery, but the defendants are not exposed to high damages. Each side gains something and the jury still performs its function of determining how much the victim receives, particularly in the middle range. Since Texas law caps punitive damages at $400,000, most of Lt. Giuliano’s damages could never have been collected. A high low agreement spared both parties the costs and uncertainties of appealing on the issue of excessive verdict.

Continue reading "Texas Jury Delivers $17.5 Million Verdict After the Death of an Army Officer Caused by Trucking Company Negligence" »

Michael Clarkin, a worker at the South Carolina Ports Authority in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina suffered permanent, debilitating injuries in November, 2004. Mr. Clarkin was a clerk, whose job involved tracking container shipments. The facility where he worked offloads cargo ships.

The incident occurred when a toplifter (similar to a forklift) failed and a cargo container dropped nearly fifty feet and bounced onto the SUV Mr. Markin was sitting in. Mr. Markin was about 40 feet away from the loading area when the metal cargo container broke loose. Rescue workers extricated him from the vehicle and took him to the Medical University of South Carolina. Mr. Markin suffered injuries to his legs and back, as well as neurological injuries that have resulted in profound changes in his personality and ability to process thoughts.

The settlement involved three defendants: Kalmar Industries, which manufactured the lifter, Gregory Poole Equipment Company, which sold the lifter, and the State Ports Authority. Liability centered on a design defect in the lifting equipment. The State Ports Authority was aware of problems with the lifter-it had been twice been reported for problems and twice cleared for service the day before the incident. The Port Authority’s liability was limited to $140,000, however. The cost of long-term care and high salaries in the longshoreman profession explain the amount of the settlement.

Continue reading "$13.2 Million Settlement for Worker in Charleston, South Carolina" »

On Mother’s Day, 2002, five-year-old Leilani Guitierrez was a passenger in her mother’s Suburban. They were headed home from a carousel ride in Costa Mesa, California.

This innocent little girl’s life was turned upside down by a Defense Department worker’s negligence. The worker ran a red light and broadsided the Guitierrez’s vehicle, sending it careening into a utility pole. The injuries were catastrophic. The bones in Leilani’s neck were crushed.

This little girl will spend the rest of her life – a life that will probably end by the age of 35 – in a motorized wheelchair. She spent 250 days in the hospital and has endured 24 surgeries. Leilani will require complete assistance with all the tasks associated with everyday life - eating, dressing, bathing, and getting into the wheelchair - her only means of moving. She still has her mind, but the functioning of her body was lost forever.

Leilani and her parents filed suit against the government. Like any other employer, the government is responsible for the negligent driving of its employees while they are on official business. The federal district court awarded $54 million in actual damages to Leilani this week. An additional $1 million judgment went to her parents for their own suffering as a result of seeing their child suffer.

As in any case involving a minor, the court will oversee distributions of the funds, to make sure that the funds are spent on medical expenses and related care. Much of the judgment will go to pay past medical expenses.

While this is a large award, I want to point out two aspects of this judgment to those who cry out for so-called “tort reform.” First, this isn’t a case of a run-away jury, because there was no jury. A U.S. District Court judge determined the amount of Leilani Guitierrez’s damages. Second, there were no punitive damages in this case. $23 million of this award is for the proven actual cost of caring for a completely helpless little girl, around the clock ... for the rest of her life. $31 million is to compensate her for her suffering and the loss of opportunity for an ordinary life. Leilani’s case shows why absolute caps on damages are short-sighted. There are instances where an injured person’s actual, proven damages are extraordinarily high. But these are the exception, rather than the rule. The cap argument comes down to a simple question: In an exceptional case, who should bear the extra costs- the victim or the wrongdoer? Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but as for me, I’m proud to fight for the victim.

Thanks to the Orange County Register

On an icy, foggy interstate, a tractor trailer ran into a young man who had stopped his vehicle near North Platte, Nebraska. Traffic was backed up from other collisions in dense fog over an icy interstate. The young man slid into a mile marker post as he stopped. He then got out of his vehicle to help other people along the roadway, and also to check the damage to his vehicle. That is when the tractor trailer ran into the back of his vehicle at over 35 mph, also striking him. His injuries included four fractured vertebrae, fractured ribs and scapula (shoulder blade) and nerve damage to his right arm. His medical bills exceeded $230,000.

In the lawsuit that followed, the truck driver and the trucking company claimed the man contributed to the collision by not turning on his hazard lights and by getting out of his vehicle. The jury accepted this argument in part: the man received a $11,230,000 verdict that was reduced by 20% due to the man's partial negligence.

Continue reading "$11.23 Million Verdict in Nebraska Tractor Trailer Rear-End Collision" »

This unfortunate case involved a truck driver in Indiana turning left across two lanes and a median, disregarding oncoming traffic in the lane he entered. The tractor-trailer struck a driver with the right of way, flipping the smaller vehicle over and causing it to slide on its roof for nearly 150 feet. The driver of that vehicle suffered head injuries including a horrific injury to the scalp. The driver, a 79 year old father of three, was hospitalized for 28 days, slipping in and out of consciousness. His medical bills alone amounted to $131,000.00. The driver died one day after being transferred to a nursing home for additional care.

His family brought suit against the driver and the trucking company. A jury rejected the defendants’ argument that the accident was the deceased man’s fault and returned a verdict of $1,486,400 — $1,000,000 to the family for wrongful death and $486,400 for the man’s suffering over those last 30 days before he died.

Continue reading "Chicago Jury Awards $1.4 Million Dollars in Fatality Caused by Tractor Trailer" »

In this case, a tractor trailer backed up unexpectedly, crushing a landfill worker between the trailer and a bulldozer blade. The tractor trailer didn't have a back-up alarm - an inexpensive device designed to alert workers to backing trucks and designed to prevent just this sort of incident.

The truck driver, who had only been on the job three days, became stuck at the landfill. Apparently, this wasn't the first time this had happened, because the landfill had policies in place to deal with the situation. Landfill policy required truck drivers to personally hook a chain to their trucks so that a bulldozer could back the truck up to free it. The landfill instituted this policy to promote safety and prevent damage to the trucks. In this instance, the new truck driver simply waited in his truck and a landfill employee hooked a chain to the truck (a violation of the landfill’s own policy). A bulldozer operator then pulled the truck backwards to the machine the injured worker attended at the landfill (he did not work for the landfill; he worked for the machine owner). The worker later testified at deposition that he went to the cab of the truck and told the driver that he was going behind the truck to unhook the chain, to which the driver nodded. The worker then walked to the rear of the truck and entered the area between the truck and the bulldozer. Without warning, the truck started moving backwards and crushed the worker. The quick-thinking bulldozer operator rotated his machine, thus sparing the worker any further injuries. The tractor-trailer driver claimed another landfill worker motioned for him to back up just before the tragic incident.

This incident snapped the worker’s femur and crushed his pelvis. He now requires a walker to attempt to walk even short distances, and he must use a wheelchair for any longer movements. Needless to say, he can no longer perform his former job or any other similar work. A single father of three teenage sons at the time of the incident, he sustained lifetime earning losses estimated by an expert to be between $800,000 and $1,200,000.

This case settled before trial for $3,350,000: $2,350,000 from the landfill and $1,000,000 from the trucking company that employed the driver.

Perhaps this sort of injury could have been prevented by a simple back-up alarm. You have probably heard these on many trash trucks, school buses, and other machinery. With a properly functioning back-up alarm, the worker would have heard the alarm start beeping the instant the truck was put in reverse, giving him warning to move out of the way. This is an all-too familiar situation, one I have written about before, but some trucking companies continue to ignore the rest of their industry and will not install these devices, despite the cost to others in terms of safety.

Continue reading "$3.35 Million Settlement for Landfill Worker Crushed between Heavy Vehicles" »

This case involves an injury to the driver of a tractor-trailer, due to a defectively designed cruise control on a Freightliner truck. The driver in this case had his cruise control set on his Freightliner FLD 120 tractor when he entered an interchange ramp between two highways. When he stepped on the brake, he claimed the cruise control failed to disengage and he could not make the turns on the ramp. The truck tipped over, rolled over the guardrail, down the embankment, and landed upside-down, crushing the roof. The truck driver was trapped inside for two hours until rescue workers finally freed him.

The driver had to have his left arm amputated above the shoulder. After this, he could not drive a truck and had difficulty using a prosthetic arm due to skin breakdown and continuing pain.

At trial, the injured driver presented evidence showing that Freightliner knew that the cruise control on all cars made in this country includes a redundant, failsafe cutoff switch. However, Freightliner designed its cruise control with only one cutoff switch, according to the driver's experts. With a single cutoff cruise control switch, if something goes wrong in the switch monitoring the brake pedal, there is no backup device to disengage it. Instead, it stays on — plowing ahead at full speed, at precisely the time when the driver needs to slow down.

The driver also showed that while rollover accidents are the leading causes of injuries to truck passengers, Freightliner resisted efforts to establish specific crashworthiness rules and standards to prevent injuries.

Freightliner claimed that the driver was going too fast when he entered the ramp. They said no truck could withstand the forces involved in rolling over at that speed, and that they had strengthened the cab roof when designing the truck model in question, compared to previous models. The jury disagreed with Freightliner and found that the driver suffered damages totaling $5,500,000 and awarding punitive damages of an additional $10,000,000.

Continue reading "$15.5 Million Dollar Verdict for Injured Truck Driver in Defective Cruise Control and Crashworthiness Case" »

This tragic case involved the death of a three-year old girl, caused by a tractor-trailer crossing the center line and striking the van in which the little girl was riding. Injuries to children are devastating, and highlight the importance of what injury lawyers do for the public. Her mother was driving the van, as they returned home from vacation. Apparently, the truck driver had an epileptic seizure at the wheel, causing him to lose control of the vehicle.

The little girl was trapped in her car seat and suffered massive head injuries. Her parents and two brothers could only look on with horror as four and a half hours elapsed before rescuers extracted her from the vehicle and took her to a hospital, where doctors pronounced her dead. Her parents sought compensation for the loss of her life, the loss of her companionship to her parents, and for the severe emotional damages they suffered.

At trial, the girl’s family presented an EMS report showing that the driver had suffered a classic grand mal seizure (loss of consciousness, shaking all over, eyes rolled up, biting his tongue) two weeks before taking his commercial truck driver’s license exam. What probably assured the jury that the truck driver totally and callously disregarded the safety of others was when they viewed videotapes of him driving his car on a suspended license — during the trial, with his three year old daughter in the car! The jury returned a verdict for the girl’s family of $4,500,000: $1,000,000 to each parent for emotional damages, $700,000 for their loss of her companionship, and $1,800,000 for her lost life. After a new trial was ordered on the loss of companionship portion, the defendant settled for a confidential amount between $3,800,000 and $4,500,000.

Continue reading "Verdict for Family in Epileptic Truck Driver Case" »

Here is a truck accident case that illustrates how dangerous rest areas can be.

In this instance, a truck driver illegally parked her rig along I-80 in Pennsylvania just before the exit ramp to a rest stop. When the driver got back in her rig, instead of going through the rest area and using the entrance ramp back onto the interstate, she drove diagonally across the exit ramp. Another tractor trailer driver, approaching from behind, was unable to avoid the first rig, and collided violently after trying to swerve left. The resulting collision burst the fuel tank on the approaching vehicle. The ensuing fire burned the second driver to death. His two children brought a wrongful death suit against the negligent driver of the first rig.

The defending driver claimed that she had her turn signal on and he should have been able to avoid a slow-moving truck. The jury disagreed, finding the exit-ramp cutting driver was entirely at fault. The jury awarded a total of $4 million: $900,000 for the children’s’ loss and $3.1 million for the driver’s injuries.

Continue reading "Multimillion Dollar Verdict: Truck Cutting Across Exit Ramp" »

In this products liability case, a 32 year old firefighter, was on the job, operating pumper truck controls at a barn fire, was severely injured when she was pinned between the vehicle and a fence. The truck began to move forward, with no one at the wheel, when the water pump was turned on. According to experts, the truck was defectively designed because it could unexpectedly shift power from the pump to the vehicle - thereby causing the truck to move.

The heroic young firefighter had tried to use the "kill" switch to stop the vehicle, before it crushed her. She ended up being paralyzed from the waist down. The truck crushed her pelvis, broke her ribs, and completely removed the skin from portions of her back and thighs. She underwent numerous surgeries and treatments, including skin grafts and debridements (where the dead skin is scrubbed off with a brush by nurses - one of the most painful procedures for any patient to undergo). All of these injuries forever changed her life and profoundly lessened her ability to perform the basic tasks of caring for herself.

At trial, the jury found her injuries totaled $8,750,000, but she could only recover $1,531,000 of that from the manufacturer of the fire truck. She could not recover from the fire department she worked for because state law prohibited her from suing it. Another defendant, the designer of the pump system, reached a confidential settlement with the injured firefighter after two days of trial.

Continue reading "Defective Fire Truck Verdict in New Mexico" »

In this case, a family of four was stopped at a red light at the ramp to the toll road in Gary, Indiana, when a fully-loaded moving van ran over their vehicle. The moving van driver, employed by Bekins Van Lines, was apparently distracted by smoke coming from the trailer of his vehicle and didn’t notice the vehicle stopped ahead of him.

One woman in the car was killed instantly, while her daughter suffered brain injuries and her infant grandson was seriously injured when thrown from the vehicle. The moving van also struck another car, injuring two more people. Subsequent investigation by the state police revealed mechanical problems with his vehicle that should have put the vehicle out of service. The driver of the truck had 21 moving violations on his record.

At trial, considering only the injuries to the survivors (the wrongful death matter was resolved elsewhere), the jury reached a $16,145,000 verdict: $1,020,000 for the woman with brain injuries, $25,000 for the injured child, $100,000 for the husband for loss of his wife’s companionship, and $15,000,000 in punitive damages. (The punitive damages award was later overturned by an appellate court).

Continue reading "Large Verdict in Indiana Moving Van Case" »

In this case, a tractor-trailer driver, high on methamphetamines, tried to pass a van that was making a left turn. The driver of the rig slammed into the left side of the van. The driver had been driving for many hours, as he was on his way back from a run to California. One of the passengers in the van was a 14 year old cheerleader on her way to a national cheerleading competition. The trucking company blamed the driver of the van (!) for not keeping a proper look-out for the tractor-trailer approaching from the rear.

The young lady in this collision was flown by helicopter to the hospital after sustaining closed head injuries. She spent nine days in the hospital, six of those in ICU. CT and PET scans revealed brain damage after she was released. She required 4 ½ months of physical, occupational, and speech therapy. Her personality changed and she suffered from mood swings and depression (a common occurrence after such injuries).

At trial, the defendant truck company and driver argued that the young lady had made a full recovery, and that she was exaggerating her injuries. The jury rejected these arguments and awarded her 5 million dollars: $1.6 million for her past damages, $214,000 in future medical expenses, and $3.4 million in punitive damages.

Continue reading "Truck Accident Verdict in Missouri for Negligent Passing Case" »

This case involves the danger of 18-wheelers backing up without a warning alarm. By now, back-up alarms are a common feature on all kinds of vehicles and equipment. The reason they are so common is simple. They work. The alarms are very good at preventing injuries. However, the trucking companies haven't always followed suit with the latest in safety technology.

In this case, a 55-year old warehouse worker's pelvis was crushed, his ureter was severed, and he had to undergo a colostomy because a tractor trailer without a back-up alarm crushed him between the trailer and a loading dock. There was an apparent miscommunication between the worker and the truck driver. According to the warehouse worker and an expert forensic engineer, the worker would never have been hurt if there had been a back-up alarm. The tractor trailer and its equipment were therefore unreasonably dangerous and defective because there was no back-up alarm. The worker had $715,000 in medical costs, and $250,000 in income losses.

At trial, the members of the jury evaluated the evidence and agreed that the cause of the worker's injuries was the missing back-up alarm. They found that the truck and its equipment were unreasonably dangerous, and awarded $14,000,000 in damages for the warehouse worker's losses.

Continue reading "Verdict for Illinois 18-Wheeler Products Liability Case Involving No Back-Up Alarm" »

The victim in this case was a 35-year old worker, who was stopped in traffic along I-610 inside a boxed cargo van. A truck driver for G&D Trucking was loaded down with grain, and slammed into the rear of the van. The truck driver did not have a driver's license. There was very little damage to the vehicles, and G&D claimed that the van's brake lights were not working at the time of the collision.

The victim had soft-tissue injuries to his neck and back, and identified two herniated discs. His doctor also found an annular tear in the L3-4. As a result, the victim suffered pain and stiffness, and underwent extensive physical therapy. He also missed time from work. G&D Trucking countered that the disc injuries were due to something other than the collision, and found an expert to testify that the time the victim spent away from work was excessive.

The jury found for the victim in the amount of $102,000, which was increased to $118,462.53 when pre-judgment interest was factored in. The jury arrived at the verdict as follows: $22,000 for past medical expenses; $5,000 for past physical impairment; $35,000 for past lost earning capacity; and $40,000 for past mental pain and anguish.

Continue reading "18-Wheeler Wreck Verdict in Starr County, Texas for I-610 Rear Ender" »

In this case, the victim was working along I-95 as a construction engineer. A crossover across the median of I-95 had been installed as part of a road construction project. As he was driving, the victim noticed that a construction sign was blocking the deceleration lane leading into the median crossover. This was a threat to the safety of those on the interstate, so the victim drove into the deceleration lane, where he intended to remove the construction sign. The traffic behind the victim was slowing down, but a tractor trailer owned by CRST, Inc., traveling at a higher rate of speed, swerved left and into the deceleration lane. The 18-wheeler slammed into the victim's vehicle, and sent it careening 150 feet into the median ditch, where the 18-wheeler crushed the vehicle the victim was driving. Both the victim and another passenger were trapped inside the burning vehicle. The tractor trailer was found to have defective and inoperable brakes. The victim relied on thorough investigation and expert testimony to find CRST's responsibility for the collision, due to the driver's lack of qualifications, insufficient maintenance to the truck, and a number of safety and equipment violations.

The 56-year old victim was airlifted from the scene to the University of Pennsylvania Hospital, where his left leg was amputated below the knee. His right leg was also amputated a few days later. He was fitted with prosthetic legs, and he was eventually able to return to work after several months. His medical bills came to about $150,000, and he lost income of $24,600.

CRST agreed to pay $3,000,000 in damages to the victim.

Continue reading "Truck Accident Settlement in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in Defective Brakes Incident on I-95" »

In this case, two big rigs crashed into one another near Madison, GA. One of the trucks, owned by Crain Plumbing, was being driven by a truck driver who was blind in his right eye! This condition deprived him of depth perception. The Crain truck driver was traveling north, but swerved into the southbound lane, where the second tractor trailer was traveling. (The Crain driver later said a pickup truck had pulled out in front of him). The second truck was being driven by a 44-year old driver. Her 45-year old husband was in the cabin with her, asleep. The driver was killed, and her husband was very seriously injured.

Given the circumstances, the parties reached a settlement for $12,000,000. $6,000,000 was allocated to the deceased driver's estate, and $6,000,000 to the surviving husband.

Continue reading "18 Wheeler Wreck Settlement for Madison, Georgia Wrongful Death" »

This case involves Old Dominion Freight Line I. A 23-year old man was on the job, using a pressure washer to clean an 18-wheeler. His co-worker motioned to the truck driver to pull forward. The truck driver did so, reportedly without checking the truck's blind spots before moving the rig. If he had done so, the accident apparently would have been avoided. In addition it was reported that Old Dominion failed to provide necessary safety training to the driver, failed to adequately supervise the truck driver, and did not provide a required area specifically for maintaining Old Dominion's trucks. The 23-year old was run over by the rear wheels of the truck's trailer. His injuries included: disfiguring scars, multiple foot, ankle, hip, rib and skull fractures, an ear laceration, loss of hearing in one of his ears, and resulting post-traumatic stress disorder. He required surgery to repair his ankle and foot. His past medical expenses totaled $40,428. He lost wages in the amount of $9,600. His future medical expenses were projected at $60,000 and his future lost income was $215,000.

The trial lasted 11 days. After deliberating for 1 1/2 days, the jury awarded the young man $1,600,000 plus $141,676 in prejudgment interest against Old Dominion and the truck driver.

Continue reading "Tractor Trailer Accident Verdict in Greensboro, North Carolina in Failure to Check Blind Spots Case" »

In this case, the victim was a 32-year old man who was killed instantly when an 18-wheeler reportedly ran a stop sign at an intersection. The victim's family also asserted that the trucking company had negligently hired the truck driver, and had negligently entrusted the truck to him.

The case was settled for $2,300,000.

Continue reading "Tractor Trailer Accident Settlement in York County, South Carolina Stop Sign Run / Wrongful Death Case" »

A 3-year-old little girl was riding in her car seat in her father's vehicle. A Heafner Tire Group truck was traveling in the opposite direction, and crossed over the center line. The little girl's father swerved to avoid the head-on collision and lost control. He briefly went onto the shoulder of the road, and then steered back onto the roadway, colliding into the Heafner truck. The little girl's jaw was broken, and she received a liver laceration. The jaw fracture alone required three surgeries, and her past medical expenses totaled about $40,000.

At trial, after deliberating for about three hours, the jury awarded the little girl $500,000 in actual damages. Her attorney had previously requested $425,000 from the at-fault company to settle the case, but Heafner reportedly refused.

Continue reading "Tractor Trailer Accident Verdict in Allendale County, South Carolina for Center Line Cross Case" »

As a resource for other attorneys and members of the public, I have decided to begin featuring verdicts and settlements that have come down in recent years in truck accident cases. I will emphasize verdicts and settlements from North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and adjoining states, but we will also include cases from other states.

The first case we will examine involves a pedestrian in downtown Charleston, South Carolina. A man in his mid-30's was walking across Meeting Street at the same time a truck owned by Sysco Food Services was backing out of a loading zone and into the street. The pedestrian was hit by the truck, and sustained soft tissue neck and back injuries, which caused a partial permanent impairment. The pedestrian said he was hit because the trucker failed to keep a proper lookout, was going too fast, and failed to maintain control over the truck. Sysco denied all responsibility, and said that the pedestrian was solely at fault.

At trial, after deliberating for two hours, the jury awarded the pedestrian $78,500 in actual damages, with no punitive damages. The jury found the pedestrian to be partly at fault, but less than 51% negligent.

Continue reading "Tractor Trailer Accident Verdict in Charleston, South Carolina for Backup Case" »